Chromanator Vs Commotion
Posted: Fri, 4th Jun 2004, 12:58pm
Post 1 of 9
Just wondering what the main difference is between Chromanator and Commotion .. thanks
Posted: Fri, 4th Jun 2004, 1:05pm
Post 2 of 9
Posted: Fri, 4th Jun 2004, 1:09pm
Post 3 of 9
Posted: Fri, 4th Jun 2004, 4:44pm
Post 4 of 9
I have Commotion. It's pretty useful, but I wouldn't recommend getting it. Pinnacle has stopped updating it, so basically it's a dead program. Chromanator, meanwhile, is being constantly updated and improved. There are some features Commotion has that Chromanator doesn't, but Chromanator is definitely a better buy, for the price and power.
Posted: Fri, 4th Jun 2004, 10:14pm
Post 5 of 9
if u wanted to spend more money is commotion real good?
Posted: Fri, 4th Jun 2004, 11:08pm
Post 6 of 9
If I could respend the money, I would buy After Effects instead. A lot more people use it, and it will continue to be developed in the future.
Posted: Wed, 9th Jun 2004, 11:57pm
Post 7 of 9
I have after effects and never use it and I am trying to get rid of it because I got it for an amazing price, new and everything, unregistered, I would not suggest getting AE until your positive its what you are looking for.
Posted: Thu, 10th Jun 2004, 2:06am
Post 8 of 9
Why don't you use it? It does take a while to learn how, but you can do so much with it.
Posted: Thu, 10th Jun 2004, 2:11am
Post 9 of 9
Learning AE is WAY worth it. And it's not that long anyway. It only looks complicated. Just do all the free tuts on Digital-Tutors.com and you're pretty much set