You are viewing an archive of the old fxhome.com forums. The community has since moved to hitfilm.com.

FXhome reviews: Blu-ray disc

Posted: Fri, 22nd Feb 2008, 5:04pm

Post 1 of 6

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Rating: +3


When we started planning this article the intention was to launch into a comparison of Blu-ray and HD-DVD, in order to help people make a decision as to which format to support (if any). Even towards the end of 2007 HD-DVD looked to be in trouble and, mere months later, Toshiba have now announced that they are abandoning the format that they helped create.

It still leaves movie buyers with a dilemma though, namely: Is high definition worth it at all? While Blu-ray has become king of the hi-def formats, a question still lingers over how necessary it is at all, given that most people are still perfectly happy with standard DVD. We thought we’d take a look at the Blu-ray format to see what it offers.

What is blu-ray?

If you’ve been living under a rock for the last year you may not have heard of Blu-ray. Designed as a replacement for DVD, Blu-ray offers high definition video, a silly name and much larger storage capacity on a disc that is the same size and shape as a normal CD or DVD. Practically speaking, the increased storage means that you'll be able to watch your Lord of the Rings extended editions without having to swap the disc halfway through.

Another important difference is that the menus are now all powered by Java, a technology you might have encountered while browsing the Internet. Whereas DVD uses an archaic system of pre-rendered background movies and low quality overlaid titles, Blu-ray can have properly interactive, high quality elements. Don’t be surprised when silly games start appearing on Disney releases.


The negative side to all this new technology is that you’ll need a new piece of kit to actually be able to use it. While there are stand-alone Blu-ray players, the most logical route is to simply purchase a PlayStation 3 – which will give you Blu-ray playback as well as ‘next-gen’ games. The PS3’s increasing popularity is cited as the primary factor in the downfall of HD-DVD, introducing Blu-ray to a market outside of the AV hardcore.

HD quality?

The big question, of course, is whether it’s all worth it. Does Blu-ray offer a significant advantage over standard DVD? Unlike the shift from VHS to DVD, the answer isn’t an unqualified ‘yes’. DVD offered benefits irrespective of the quality and size of your television, helped in no small part by VHS being almost entirely rubbish.

With HD content you really need an HDTV, with sizes of 32 inches or above showing a definite improvement. Anything smaller than that and the difference between Blu-ray and a decently HDMI-upscaled DVD is minimal, especially when viewed at a ‘normal’ viewing distance.

At 32 inches or above the new format is definitely worth considering, though. On our 46 inch screen there’s an astonishing clarity to Blu-ray video, highlighted particularly well in slick, modern productions such as Sunshine, with it’s bold cinematography and unusual lighting. There’s a fine detail, retaining all the definition of full cinema projection, minus the projection errors and annoying children. Animation is served even better, with colours leaping off the screen in stunning fashion. The intricate computer interfaces found in Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within can finally be seen in all their sci-fi glory, with each individual button and read-out fully identifiable. We can’t wait to see something like The Incredibles at this quality.


The flipside of increased fidelity is that it also shows up any flaws in the source material. If you’re watching old TV shows, particularly those shot on video during the 80s and 90s, or anything shot on 16mm or below, then Blu-ray isn’t going to be particularly kind. It’s only really films shot on extremely high quality stock, or which have been seriously remastered, which truly show the benefits of the HD resolution.

The increased storage capacity of the format also enables lossless audio to be included, although you’ll need some serious audio equipment to truly tell the difference between that and the traditional standards of DTS and Dolby Digital. Given that audio has always been a few steps ahead of visuals, it’s no surprise that there isn’t anything especially impressive in this arena – there’s no need to re-invent the wheel.

It's in no way as revolutionary as the VHS to DVD switch, which took home cinema onto an entirely new level after twenty years of tape-based torture. HD is more of an evolution, embracing the latest technologies but also discovering something of a financial divide. While DVD improved quality for everyone on all set-ups and budgets, Blu-ray runs a risk of being segregated into an elitist position in which it is only truly appreciated by real technophiles. It depends entirely on pricing, not only of Blu-ray discs and players but also on the large HDTVs that form an essential part of the experience. The real question is this: Will the demise of HD-DVD enable Blu-ray to thrive and become a mass market format, or will the lack of true competition and high tech requirements limit it to a niche position, much like the fate of Laserdisc in the 80s and 90s?

Extra features

Disappointingly, most Blu-rays are simply recycling the bonus content from their DVD equivalents, although this will hopefully change as the format becomes more established. Particularly disappointing are the uninspired and often extremely fiddly menus, most of which seem to have derived from the exact same source template. It tarnishes the Blu-ray experience, with navigation often being a chore.

Blu-Ray designers also seem to be stuck in a DVD mindset, designing features and menus that could sit quite happily on a DVD and which don’t take advantage of the format’s increased interactivity. DVDs suffered from a similar lack of imagination and understanding of the format’s capabilities in its early days, so with luck this will be corrected with future releases.


Several discs already released have fantastic extras, such as the Harry Potter: Order of the Phoenix – all conveniently available on a single disc, with a slightly more inspired menu system. Close Encounters of the Third Kind gets a particularly deluxe treatment, with disc 1 containing all three versions of the film and the extras saved for disc 2, while the pack also includes a surprisingly thick photo book and poster.

Yes or No?

The question of whether to embrace Blu-ray remains somewhat unanswered – let alone whether you should consider replacing your existing DVD collection. Currently it remains something of a toy for collectors and those with large amounts of disposable income, due not to the direct costs of Blu-ray but to all the surrounding equipment that is required to fully appreciate it – mainstream audiences may not want their living space obliterated by a monolithic home cinema set-up.


For the movie fans, technophiles and hardcore collectors that can afford to indulge in their hobby, Blu-ray offers an experience rivalled only by the cinema itself. With HD-DVD’s failure there is no longer any fear of investing in the ‘wrong’ format. The level of Blu-ray’s ultimate success will depend on the public’s appetite for high definition visuals in general and their level of fatigue with the DVD format but, with the continued support of the PS3, Blu-ray is no longer a risky proposition.
Posted: Fri, 22nd Feb 2008, 6:02pm

Post 2 of 6

b4uask30male

Force: 5619 | Joined: 22nd Feb 2002 | Posts: 3497

Windows User

Gold Member

Good write up, however can you let me know if you know if they are going to make games in HD on the blue ray, i'm not talking call of duty 4 where it still fits on a standard disc, i'm mean are they going to use the whole disc with it's huge size, or are we still limited to 4 or 8gb.?

Thanks
Posted: Fri, 22nd Feb 2008, 6:17pm

Post 3 of 6

Redhawksrymmer

Force: 18442 | Joined: 19th Aug 2002 | Posts: 2620

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 3 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User MacOS User

SuperUser

Great article, glad I chose Blu-ray as my next generation format when I bought my PS3 last year.

b4uask - PS3 games are currently based on the Blu-Ray disc format, but since PC Blu-ray drives are still quite expensive and not very common, it's a pretty safe bet that there'll still be quite a few years until we see PC games on the new format. Until then I guess we have to do with multiple DVDs. smile
Posted: Fri, 22nd Feb 2008, 6:32pm

Post 4 of 6

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Bear in mind that PC game releases only properly shifted over to DVD in the last year-or-two. I remember big debates on gaming forums over DVD releases, and people complaining that they didn't have a DVD drive in their computer, even just a couple of years back.

If games start to get bigger to fill blu-rays it will also pose an interesting problem for download services such as Steam - downloading a blu-ray's worth of content would take quite a while, even on a fast connection. smile
Posted: Fri, 22nd Feb 2008, 7:15pm

Post 5 of 6

SketchWork

Force: 2065 | Joined: 11th May 2007 | Posts: 386

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 2 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User Windows User MacOS User

Gold Member

We purchased a PS3 for showcasing our HD content and obviously we got a great game console at the same time smile

As Tarn said you really don't see a significant visual impact unless you view on a large TV. We have a 1080P 50" and Blue Ray and our own HD content looks absolutely amazing. We got "Click" with the PS3 and that looks really cool!

We have held off buying any blue ray movies until we knew what format was going to win - but now it has one I'll be going to get a few blue-ray movies to watch.
Posted: Sun, 24th Feb 2008, 4:44pm

Post 6 of 6

Hybrid-Halo

Force: 9315 | Joined: 7th Feb 2003 | Posts: 3367

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 3 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User FXpreset Maker Windows User MacOS User

SuperUser

Ian, My understanding is this: Games don't require releasing on a HD format to display HD quality at HD resolutions.

BluRay is a type of data storage which allows for larger:better quality files to be stored on the disk.

Computer games run in an engine, so the video created by it is done so procedurally/as part of the process of the games engine. Therefore - if the texture files are large in resolution the visual quality can be high definition.

Both the Xbox360 and the PS3 output games at Hi-Def resolutions. Arguably games are unlikely to be stored on a HD disc this generation as it's unlikely the current hardware will be able to load/unload the texture information fast enough for it to run smoothly/at a high frame rate as well.

Correct me if I am wrong. wink

Based off of this, I would guess that early on, PC gamers will be the first to benefit from extreme hi-def content due to the constant evolution of technology and internet accessibility with games being shipped on DVD's as standard, though with an option to download additional Hi-Def files for those who can run the content.

Anyway, I agree with the general verdict of this article. I think that it will be a while before Hi-Def becomes an accepted format though now there is little doubt that bluray is the next step (rather than HD-DVD) more people will be enticed into going Hi-Def. It always helps that a popular games console supports the format too. wink

-Hybrid.