You are viewing an archive of the old fxhome.com forums. The community has since moved to hitfilm.com.

Inebriation

Posted: Tue, 31st Aug 2010, 12:03pm

Post 1 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

THE DRUNK IS REAL.

'Inebriation' is a mock trailer created by Atomic Productions parodying the concept of Inception, in a dangerous and unstable world of shared drinking and drunk within drunk.

Liquor up, frat hard, and get ready- for INEBRIATION.

Directed by Ben & Andrew Adams
Dir. of Photography Ben Adams
Written & Edited by Andrew Adams

Starring
John Redlinger
Sam Schweikert
Trevor Gitlin
Elizabeth Judd
Joshua Cavazos
Naeem Munaf
Courtney Snyder
Joel Cavazos

With Brett Thiele, Ben Haschke, and Jonathan Salinas.
____

This was a project I made decently haphazardly for a college class I had this summer, and it seemed only by chance that it was pulled together so well, so fast. None of us really saw that coming- but the cast, the timeliness of the material/script, and Ben's meticulous nature with matching shots and lighting gave us an internet hit.

We hope you like it!


More Info
Posted: Tue, 31st Aug 2010, 4:47pm

Post 2 of 57

Paradox Pictures

Force: 889 | Joined: 18th Mar 2008 | Posts: 387

CompositeLab Pro User EffectsLab Pro User VideoWrap User FXpreset Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Best Parody Yet. Even better than this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrYPJ4Yc31g
Posted: Tue, 31st Aug 2010, 7:21pm

Post 3 of 57

Sollthar

Force: 13360 | Joined: 30th Oct 2001 | Posts: 6094

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 2 Pro User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User MacOS User

SuperUser

Apart from the sometimes really bad audio, this is some very cool stuff! I like how you took the cinematic language of the Inception Trailer, understood it well and turned it upside down into something completely different.
There's some really great shots in there and the editing is also tight. The main actor is brilliant and does a hilarious Leo impression. Even though the trailer has some stuff I don't find funny at all (like the guy with the fake beard) it also has some moments and lines I think are rather humorous. And it features some okay shots too, but the few awesome ones perfectly make up for them.

All in all, I really like this. Congrats on it's success, which doesn't come as a surprise seeing it effectively uses the hype of a big budget franchise to ride along with and obviously beats all the other parodies and fanmovies by a long mile simply because it's made by people who actually know what their doing filmwise, judging from the other stuff I've seen. biggrin
Posted: Wed, 1st Sep 2010, 10:52am

Post 4 of 57

The Chosen One

Force: 1449 | Joined: 5th Jun 2005 | Posts: 449

VideoWrap User Windows User

Gold Member

Wow soon you guys will be a famous as these fellows
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pShf2VuAu_Q

I'm just playing around, you guys made a very good video, keep up the good work.
Posted: Wed, 1st Sep 2010, 12:33pm

Post 5 of 57

rogolo

Force: 5436 | Joined: 29th May 2005 | Posts: 1513

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 4 User MacOS User

Gold Member

The Chosen One wrote:

Wow soon you guys will be a famous as these fellows
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pShf2VuAu_Q
Wow, I seriously didn't think people still fall for these manufactured viral ads...And LOL at the 2nd highest rated comment from Love2skate661Bako "That should be a levis commercial that would be sick" : /
Good work, though, on Inebriation! I had my doubts, but you guys churned out a very solid piece.

See what happens when you spend more than 48hrs on a film? wink
Posted: Wed, 1st Sep 2010, 7:04pm

Post 6 of 57

ben3308

Force: 5210 | Joined: 24th May 2004 | Posts: 6433

VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

rogolo wrote:

See what happens when you spend more than 48hrs on a film? wink
This is what mystifies me, because this isn't anything we did anything different on, really: we shot it in two days, did pickups/audio a bit on the third day, then edited the next day and my brother turned it into the class it was due for.

Maybe it's the whole 'predetermined structure facilitating a novel idea' that makes it work for this one, I dunno. I didn't shoot/light any different than I normally do, nor did my brother edit with different pace. biggrin

Anyhow, thanks all for watching! We appreciate it!
Posted: Wed, 1st Sep 2010, 7:34pm

Post 7 of 57

Sollthar

Force: 13360 | Joined: 30th Oct 2001 | Posts: 6094

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 2 Pro User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User MacOS User

SuperUser

Rating: +1

What mistifies you exactly? This isn't on a notably higher level then other stuff you've done - You've created awesome shots before. It just works on an emotional level much more because it uses a built in audience and built in hype as it parodies something people are really fond of and well familiar with. And it does that well. I wouldn't say it's, technically speaking, in a different league then your other stuff.

Audiences just care more for something when it's associated with what they already like rather then when you try to do something original they have to start liking (I'd say some of your original stuff would have deserved the same attention). But that's marketing for you. smile
Posted: Thu, 2nd Sep 2010, 7:41am

Post 8 of 57

miker

Force: 386 | Joined: 30th Jul 2005 | Posts: 651

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Finally, now I can post my official review.. wink

Firstly, a huge congratulations on the attention this has brought you guys. Really, really sick stuff. You've landed a youtube partnership too I see? Niiice smile.

You guys did a superb job matching.. essentially everything in this. The costumes, the look-alike actors, the mimic acting, locations, color tones, near-perfectly matched cinematography in some shots.. everything. Great stuff. And that is why I think this is getting so much attention. Also it's what's on everybody's mind right now.. Inception.. Inception. You've created something which not only looks and sounds close to what they just saw in the theater, but feels close - created in your own way. It's no wonder this is getting such great publicity.

If I have to make any complaints, here the are. As already mentioned above, the audio at some points gets pretty bad. But you already know this. The actor you chose for Eames was probably the farthest away, as far as similarities go. However, John Redlinger, and the actress chosen for Ellen Page's character are near perfect. I actually liked what you did with the bearded guy - hilarious stuff. I also have to say I think this short mocku-trailer would stand much stronger on it's own without the end blooper reel.. although I do see why you included it. I'd probably have done the same. - But that's just being nit-picky.

Great job with this, guys! Well deserved recognition. Looking forward to what comes next.
Posted: Thu, 2nd Sep 2010, 9:30am

Post 9 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Thanks, guys!

Funny enough, Naeem (who plays Yusuf in the movie, better known as 'the bearded guy') was really just a great friend/crewmate who works on John and Greg's stuff (another friend of ours) and who more-recently has migrated to working with us (on Release and our 'Live It Up' music video) as sort of a production manager.

Going into this I had a whole slew of different people cast than what we ended up with. Reese as Arthur, Chase as Fischer. And, more notably, our buddy (and sometimes actor) Brian as Leo. I had asked John about playing Eames, actually, because I don't often work with him (he's a great friend, but also a terribly busy man) and didn't want to commit him to too lengthy/important of a role, and because I knew he loved that cocky British-accented sort of persona and could play it well. Then I had my cousin (an actress, actually) as Ellen Page/Ariadne.

As things would turn out, John volunteered/wanted the role of Leo (even though we could only shoot for a day or two, and that second one ended up being his 21st birthday- quite fittingly!), I never heard back from Brian, and Chase/Reese - despite really wanting to be in it- had to go out-of-town. Oh, and my cousin was gone apparently, too. At least for the timetable I had.

So, yeah. We ended up abandoning lots of the Eames/whole crew stuff and I tried to make it more Cobb/Leo-centric, since John hadn't shaved his goatee (the same man-boy one Leo loves to sport all the time these days) in thinking about making the spoof look even closer to home. From there we sort of pulled the others together by chance. Elizabeth, who plays Ariadne, I asked on a whim after my cousin fell out- she happily said yes, asked what to wear, I described in detail to her what we needed- and she uncannily fit the part. As did Sam, who plays Arthur and is actually John's roommate and just one of my friends as well. They both worked exceedingly well.

And so, as you can imagine, I rethought once more. 'Hey, if we've got these guys, we've got to get the whole crew! So I called up Naeem, who was already helping with the project anyway and is (I dunno, sort of Asian ethnic descent) and told him to look for a wig and beard/goatee that might make his clean-shaven, short-haircut head look more like Yusuf from the movie. Low-and-behold, he brings back several options but none we like/look convincing. So, instead, we went with the most hilarious/stupid-looking of the options.

Yes, careful attention is paid to the locations Yusuf appears and the clothing he wears (sporting a pillow underneath his shirt for realistic girth smile )- but by the time jokester Naeem got on camera and said 'I haven't pooped in 3 weeks!' we laughably gave up trying to make him any bit convincing. Naeem was ridiculous, purely there (and only there the last day) for comedic relief. (Which sounds silly, given it's a comedy. But yeah.)

Same with Trevor, to an extent. With Cobb, Ariadne, Fischer, Saito, Yusuf, and Arthur- I had to have Eames, now, didn't I?

So, like Naeem, I called up T-Git and told him I needed him for a role, despite his lacking of semblance to the character as John's, Elizabeth's, and Sam's. And he came and acted under simple directions:

"Wear a suit and red tie. Look at the camera and do something funny. Think 'Gay John Cleese' for the accent."

And that was pretty much it with him. The rest/all of Trevor and Naeem's parts are just ad-libbed bits. In fact, Trevor went on this several-minute-long British rant Ben shot that made absolutely no sense, but it was hilarious. There's a shot just a few seconds into the trailer where Sam is at his knees holding his sides and Trevor is yelling at him on a parking garage. It's only for a split-second, but that's Sam literally falling to his knees laughing.

Then of course there's John, who is equally as hilarious if not funnier at moments. My two favorite people to work with, I think. And such polar opposites- but both are just powderkegs of funny, very odd, very improved skill onset. Although I'm really happy to say I think I've found my 'funnybone' with writing (all the voiceover/staged lines, I wrote myself) John's delivery and cadences came out simply unmatched. John goes to USC for acting and he's a great friend and worker- it's really a terrible shame we don't get to work with eachother more often. Some of the best work of the both of us is what we've done together, we've both agreed. But woe is life.

Just, really exciting stuff, I guess is what I'm saying in so many words. It seemingly came together so quickly (ironically, as rogolo jabs at, shot in less than 48 hours wink) and by chance had such the right cast and timeliness. Never really saw it coming, to that degree at least.

In fact, the moment I pitched it to Ben to try and get him to shoot it for me (it was a class project due at the end of the week) he said 'meh' and predicted it would be 'a worse version of the Heat parody'. Of course, he was worried more about capturing the cinematic essence and feel more than anything else- but I think we're all pretty happy with how that facet turned out. biggrin

Once more, thanks a ton for watching- we're super stoked by all this media and exposure and we're very grateful it all started and continues with our devoted and passionate friends and audience at FXHome!

We shot, like, f*cktons more footage (including multiple, full scenes) for this thing that didn't make it into what we ended up going with- which was the 'trailer format' (we shot for the option to do an abridged story/montage or a copy of the trailer)- and Ben and I are still fighting on whether it'd cheapen or enliven our current video to have some more 'Inebriation' stuff released. It's all pretty snappy and polished and clever, I'd say, the question is just if it's already too played-out now. Thoughts?
Posted: Thu, 2nd Sep 2010, 9:44am

Post 10 of 57

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Atom wrote:

We shot, like, f*cktons more footage (including multiple, full scenes) for this thing that didn't make it into what we ended up going with
I think, perhaps, that's what makes this so successful, and separates it from most amateur productions: in other words, you were ruthless with your footage. Inebriation is really tight - there isn't a single wasted shot or moment, and that's because you knew what to leave out.
Posted: Thu, 2nd Sep 2010, 9:23pm

Post 11 of 57

rogolo

Force: 5436 | Joined: 29th May 2005 | Posts: 1513

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 4 User MacOS User

Gold Member

Atom wrote:

(ironically, as rogolo jabs at, shot in less than 48 hours wink)
I was referring to the film not having the constraints that a normal 48hr project would...you guys made your own prompt, had a few days to prep, were able to sleep, could make your own creative decisions without worrying about judges/requirements, etc. Sure you had a class deadline/prompt, but the overall conditions of the project were more conducive to a successful short than a 48hr project is.

Still a fine job, of course. biggrin

(And I can't help but wonder how many more hits this would have gotten if it was released a month prior to the film's opening. But, to borrow a phrase, 'woe is life'. smile)
Posted: Fri, 3rd Sep 2010, 3:27pm

Post 12 of 57

davlin

Force: 1572 | Joined: 21st Jan 2002 | Posts: 1088

EffectsLab Pro User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

I can tell you that it was a pleasure to watch such a classy
production.
Audio was a problem but that aside it was AWESOME and it looked like a
pro trailer you would expect to see in the Cinema.
Actors were superb,camera work brilliant and editing really tight.

Well done you guys.

Dave
Posted: Tue, 7th Sep 2010, 9:16am

Post 13 of 57

Joshua Davies

Force: 25400 | Joined: 21st Mar 2001 | Posts: 3029

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXpreset Maker Windows User MacOS User

FXhome Team Member

Great work, really enjoyed this guys!
Posted: Sat, 11th Sep 2010, 3:55am

Post 14 of 57

Nifferdawn

Force: 1000 | Joined: 10th Oct 2009 | Posts: 1

VisionLab User

Gold Member

I'm not much for reveiws, but this film, well, for this film I've got one thing to say. LOL. This was so hilarious, the end made me laugh so hard. This was great. Atomic Productions is great. You guys are fantastic. biggrin
Posted: Sat, 11th Sep 2010, 6:49am

Post 15 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Thanks a ton guys, we really appreciate the praise! This video has created a fair few opportunities with the exposure it's been giving us, in addition to stuff we've already been playing close-to-the-chest already; and we're really excited to tell you all about it soon!
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2010, 8:42pm

Post 16 of 57

neoglitz

Force: 1011 | Joined: 15th Dec 2005 | Posts: 156

CompositeLab Pro User EffectsLab Pro User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

I'd buy the DVD smile Awesomeness!
Posted: Wed, 15th Sep 2010, 5:32am

Post 17 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Haha, thanks!
Posted: Wed, 22nd Sep 2010, 9:54pm

Post 18 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Rating: +5

I've had a fair few people ask me about the shots and similarities between our parody and the actual trailers, so I've created a side-by-side here for anyone interested. It's lacking 1 or 2 shots that I thought were more of a stretch than anything else, and ones that didn't appear in the trailer but were in the film (like the train-tracks or Yusuf's office).

Still, hope some of you enjoy this- a little insight into just how many shots we tried (in some form or another) to replicate in a comedic manner. Pic below (big, so be warned)

Posted: Thu, 23rd Sep 2010, 8:24am

Post 19 of 57

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

The word, I think, is 'stunning'.

That comparison makes Inebriation even more of an impressive achievement.

The matching of costumes, locations and lighting is seriously impressive.
Posted: Thu, 23rd Sep 2010, 8:54am

Post 20 of 57

Hybrid-Halo

Force: 9315 | Joined: 7th Feb 2003 | Posts: 3367

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 3 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User FXpreset Maker Windows User MacOS User

SuperUser

Thumbs up from me.
Posted: Thu, 23rd Sep 2010, 8:54am

Post 21 of 57

Joshua Davies

Force: 25400 | Joined: 21st Mar 2001 | Posts: 3029

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXpreset Maker Windows User MacOS User

FXhome Team Member

Yeah, there is some great work in there guys - really impressive!

These skills could come in handy later in the year actually don't you think Simon? wink
Posted: Thu, 23rd Sep 2010, 9:12am

Post 22 of 57

er-no

Force: 9531 | Joined: 24th Sep 2002 | Posts: 3964

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 2 Pro User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User MacOS User

SuperUser

Guys, that was brilliant wink Nice one!
Posted: Thu, 23rd Sep 2010, 4:35pm

Post 23 of 57

Sollthar

Force: 13360 | Joined: 30th Oct 2001 | Posts: 6094

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 2 Pro User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User MacOS User

SuperUser

Loving it. Good job!
Posted: Thu, 23rd Sep 2010, 6:27pm

Post 24 of 57

davlin

Force: 1572 | Joined: 21st Jan 2002 | Posts: 1088

EffectsLab Pro User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

WOW!
You guys really go for it....I have'nt seen "Inception" so I missed a lot
the "in" stuff but those pics are damn incredible.
Posted: Thu, 23rd Sep 2010, 7:39pm

Post 25 of 57

ben3308

Force: 5210 | Joined: 24th May 2004 | Posts: 6433

VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Some of these were of course hasty (the outdoor 'cafe' shots had to be quickly filmed, as we didn't want to abuse the permission given to us to film there) are didn't have matching angle/focal length, let alone lighting. But in the things I did indeed shoot 'hastily', the goal was to capture the essence of the whole thing, which is (sort of) captured in the 'kick' - something we could really only shoot once toward the end of the shooting day - and the cafe, shots which I had studied briefly, but because there was no easily-controllable lighting (sun not out to bounce, no HMI's to plug in) I hadn't paid much attention to those.

Then there's the shots I couldn't quite get the same effect on, mainly because my "good" glass was a 28mm on an APS-C (so cropped to about 35), and not the 24, 28 and 50mm stuff that Wally Pfister uses. This is why the "I'm ready" shot features John Redlinger's face not quite as wide as Leo's in the actual film (least of all because DiCaprio has a larger face) but also because the focal length is shorter. Even so, in things like that I think I paid special attention to (and what I hope people notice) is the practicals in the room, and their placement therein - so the background lights are gelled (usually deeper tungsten, a few times gelled to daylight for a rimlight) and placed to match, as close as possible, the original frame.

Notably, my biggest success I think is in the "Give him the kick" shot, mainly because I was able to find a suitable room with similar window and furniture placement (at least within the mise-en-scene that the camera views, I had to go grab a rocking chair and backlight it with a small 1/4 tungsten gelled desk lamp) and because the focal length at 35mm crop equivalent looked almost exactly the same. From there, it's just up to the acting to have the right cadences and look similar enough; and sure enough I directed the action/stance/delivery on that line about 40 different ways before being satisfied (this was one of the last shots we got on the last shooting day).

In the end, some shots don't quite match, some easier things (like angle/perspective) I was off on, and others I just didn't have the equipment to light similarly ("This last shot" has neither the daylight-balanced flare across the bottom of the frame I wanted, nor the obligatory fill light in the right side of the frame, but I'll get over it) but I think, at least on a subconscious level, people notice the matching somewhat and appreciate what was done. And that's probably enough for me. biggrin

EDIT:
Also, my brother mismatched the shots of the 'dream machine'. You'll notice that if you compare the alternating shots, they match up almost exactly with one pair, and way off (one a semi-wide, the other a close-up) on another pair. This is because I shot the 'case' about 4 or 5 times at different locations, and though I got one that matched perfectly, and I mean perfectly, for the semi-wide - a partial silhouette, legs visible, setting the case on a quilted bedspread just like the real thing - it didn't work as well in the final parody. So we went with the close-up, and matched the partial-arm medium-close shot.
Posted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010, 11:20pm

Post 26 of 57

Dreamers Awaken

Force: 100 | Joined: 25th Sep 2010 | Posts: 2

PhotoKey Lite User

Gold Member

i loved it alot. Nice shots, graphic and parody.
Posted: Mon, 27th Sep 2010, 12:35am

Post 27 of 57

Terminal Velocity

Force: 2507 | Joined: 7th Apr 2008 | Posts: 1350

VisionLab User FXpreset Maker Windows User

Gold Member

This is just plain awesome. I especially liked the guy (I think Redlinger). He just seems to be loving his role.
I'm linking people to this on my Facebook page.
Posted: Mon, 27th Sep 2010, 3:00am

Post 28 of 57

Limey

Force: 547 | Joined: 11th Sep 2005 | Posts: 752

Gold Member

This is great. I especially like the shot-by-shot comparison.
Posted: Thu, 30th Sep 2010, 1:19am

Post 29 of 57

Sephis85

Force: 1200 | Joined: 21st Feb 2009 | Posts: 29

VisionLab User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Oustanding work chaps and chapettes. If there was any fault it would be the ending shot where you can clearly see the red safety ring at the end of the bb smg. Apart from that it was downright awesome.
Posted: Sun, 3rd Oct 2010, 7:27pm

Post 30 of 57

Fudge Dog

Force: 1955 | Joined: 17th May 2009 | Posts: 80

VisionLab User FXpreset Maker FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Hilarious biggrin 87/100
Posted: Sun, 3rd Oct 2010, 11:24pm

Post 31 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Rating: +1

That's a pretty specific rating there, Fudge Dog- but thanks! smile

Additional thanks to everyone else for the great praise on this, it's something we're continually excited to see spread and be shared with an even greater audience; and it's opened up a lot of opportunities to us that we're even more excited about letting you guys know about soon.
Posted: Mon, 4th Oct 2010, 4:57am

Post 32 of 57

Sollthar

Force: 13360 | Joined: 30th Oct 2001 | Posts: 6094

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 2 Pro User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User MacOS User

SuperUser

That's awesome to hear. Can't wait to finally see atomic power on a longer project, especially if it gets proper backing!
Posted: Tue, 5th Oct 2010, 3:41am

Post 33 of 57

The Strider

Force: 493 | Joined: 27th Jan 2008 | Posts: 230

EffectsLab Pro User FXpreset Maker FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

This is quite a hilarious spoof. But we already know this, don't we?

The best aspect is that you guys actually got pretty damn close to capturing the look and feel of the film. It tells me how far you've come and how far you can push the technology.
Posted: Mon, 11th Oct 2010, 3:29am

Post 34 of 57

FXhomer32915

Force: 1485 | Joined: 30th Aug 2008 | Posts: 126

VisionLab User VideoWrap User

Gold Member

Rating: -3

What story there was, wasn't funny and it's a shame too because you guys could probably make a significant mark in the film industry. Most of the actors have a "3-D" quality of their own and make up for some of the shortcomings, but nothing makes up for the lack of a great story. (By the way, never, ever more than ONE director. It's never a good idea!) The premise is good, but I'd suggest a story with real conflicts that everyone has experienced and the alcohol is the overall antagonist complicating all of conflicts in all of the characters' stories and must be dealt with before the conflicts can be solved. That leaves plenty of room for comedy as long as the focus of the jokes is NOT the alcohol or being drunk and the effect must be ultimately shown as a bad thing once the smoke clears. If it were me, the catalyst for all of the characters swearing off of drinking is when one of them causes someone else's death, like a drunk driving accident. I know it's a comedy killer, but it also imparts a realistic facet to the story and a respectable theme.
Posted: Mon, 11th Oct 2010, 5:49am

Post 35 of 57

ben3308

Force: 5210 | Joined: 24th May 2004 | Posts: 6433

VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

FXhomer32915 wrote:

lack of a great story....real conflicts....overall antagonist....catalyst for all of the characters swearing
Thanks for watching and commenting on our video. That in and of itself is meaningful to us, and we appreciate it. But hey, it's a parody. And a trailer at that. Not a story.

I understand you read a book by Robert McKee about twenty years ago and deemed it the Bible of filmmaking and its contents infallible, but..........this is a trailer. The thing about imparting knowledge is that for it to be salient it requires context and an analysis of the content at hand. Your knowledge, while applicable in a variety of settings, makes no sense here. It's like McKee himself was told to write a review of something he'd never seen, and he produced your commentary on this video.

Context. Salience.

Just some food for thought. When you consistently repeat the same sordid advice, and it's not applicable, then you lose credibility in criticism.

(By the way, never, ever more than ONE director. It's never a good idea!)
Coen Bros.
Posted: Mon, 11th Oct 2010, 5:54am

Post 36 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Rating: +1

First and foremost I suppose you'll be expecting me to say something like 'Thanks for watching!' before all else. But I had a sort of sighed 'well, well, well....' moment just now when I saw it was our own infamous FXhomer32915, and I knew what was coming. A blindly ridiculous adherence to the tenets of 'script and story' without even looking as to what you're watching, probably some random reference about Houston (which is especially funny to me, since I too am from Texas and am from competing -and arguably more filmmaking oriented- city of Dallas; and also now that I reside in the third of the big four in Texas, Austin) and the University of Houston's 'prestigious' film theory. Or something like that. And how sites like this are watching closely by industry professionals. Such as yourself, of course.

Well, no. I didn't get much of that last bit. But you know what? You've given that sort of bullshit to far too many people lately on different movies in the cinema, and since you felt so inclined to write- albeit more tactfully- on my movie, I might as well address it here again. I've responded clearly (and received numerous PM accolades for doing so) on RodyPolis' films to your asinine responds and rationales, and that kept you off for a while, but now you're back. And we're all, I suppose, going to have to deal with Armond White of FXHome all over again.

So before I tackle your response on my film itself, I offer a statement unaltered or wary of the comment you've made on my specific project here: Be nicer. Look at movies here for what they're worth, not what a self-imposed book in your mind says. And finally, for all that is decent, appreciate them with less cynicism.

It may be fleshed out and offer validity, but your head is so far up your ass on how smart and cultured you are to 'perfect cinema' that it's obvious you're losing any actual grounded sight or grasp on what you're actually commenting on.

So there. Now that I've said that, in defense of everyone else you've bothered and bogarted in your clever-yet-infuriating way, let me get to the brass tax of my work....

FXhomer32915 wrote:

What story there was, wasn't funny and it's a shame too because you guys could probably make a significant mark in the film industry. Most of the actors have a "3-D" quality of their own and make up for some of the shortcomings, but nothing makes up for the lack of a great story.
It's a trailer, man. I.....don't know if you got that point...

By the way, never, ever more than ONE director. It's never a good idea!
Not even worth mentioning here. You do get that we're identical twin brothers, right? That we've been doing everything filmmaking-wise together since the very beginning? I also don't really at all agree. Mostly because I know our dynamic is so much stronger than half the competitors our age out there, directorially, but also because some of the directors I find most talented and most revere are dual directors. Four words:

Joel and Ethan Coen.

And then, finally:
If it were me, the catalyst for all of the characters swearing off of drinking is when one of them causes someone else's death, like a drunk driving accident. I know it's a comedy killer, but it also imparts a realistic facet to the story and a respectable theme.
Heh. Are you serious? Did you just completely miss the blatant, obvious premise, point, and execution of this parody trailer that directly rips and re-convolutes lines and shots purely for the sake of similarity in a humorous manner, even to preposterous degrees or is it just me thinking so? biggrin
Posted: Mon, 11th Oct 2010, 9:11am

Post 37 of 57

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Although I've disagreed with FXhomer32915 on his understanding of story in the past, this latest comment is so obviously ludicrous (missing the point of Inebriation to such an absurd degree that it MUST be deliberate) that I'm now assuming it is all a big joke at our expense.
Posted: Mon, 11th Oct 2010, 9:13am

Post 38 of 57

danielgwood

Force: 5650 | Joined: 7th Jun 2010 | Posts: 224

VisionLab User PhotoKey 5 Pro User Windows User MacOS User

FXhome Team Member

FXhomer32915 wrote:

What story there was, wasn't funny and it's a shame too because you guys could probably make a significant mark in the film industry. Most of the actors have a "3-D" quality of their own and make up for some of the shortcomings, but nothing makes up for the lack of a great story. (By the way, never, ever more than ONE director. It's never a good idea!) The premise is good, but I'd suggest a story with real conflicts that everyone has experienced and the alcohol is the overall antagonist complicating all of conflicts in all of the characters' stories and must be dealt with before the conflicts can be solved. That leaves plenty of room for comedy as long as the focus of the jokes is NOT the alcohol or being drunk and the effect must be ultimately shown as a bad thing once the smoke clears. If it were me, the catalyst for all of the characters swearing off of drinking is when one of them causes someone else's death, like a drunk driving accident. I know it's a comedy killer, but it also imparts a realistic facet to the story and a respectable theme.
Out of curiosity, have you seen "Inception" ?

If not, it might be worth doing so, the trailer will make a lot more sense to you then.
Posted: Mon, 11th Oct 2010, 9:14am

Post 39 of 57

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

You don't even need to have seen Inception, really, as long as you've seen the Inception trailer. It's not like reading Inebriation correctly requires a mass of complex film knowledge.
Posted: Tue, 12th Oct 2010, 4:48pm

Post 40 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Just saw FXhomer1345t67865 gave this a 1. Well, thanks for that! wink
Posted: Tue, 12th Oct 2010, 5:13pm

Post 41 of 57

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Atom wrote:

Just saw FXhomer1345t67865 gave this a 1. Well, thanks for that! wink
You should be thankful that an industry professional even took the time to watch your movie! smile
Posted: Tue, 12th Oct 2010, 5:14pm

Post 42 of 57

swintonmaximilian

Force: 1970 | Joined: 23rd Jun 2007 | Posts: 527

VisionLab User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Rating: +4

So when does Inebriation come out? I'm really looking forward to it. One thing you should probably be aware of though is that there's this film out at the moment called Inception, and some of the stuff in your trailer seems similar. No biggie, just something to maybe keep in mind.
Posted: Wed, 13th Oct 2010, 8:27pm

Post 43 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Went over 600,000 views the other day, woo! Just thought I'd mention it. wink

(Let's hope the forthcoming one we've got can do even better)
Posted: Tue, 9th Nov 2010, 7:08am

Post 44 of 57

Fudge Dog

Force: 1955 | Joined: 17th May 2009 | Posts: 80

VisionLab User FXpreset Maker FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Posted On Facebook biggrin
Posted: Tue, 9th Nov 2010, 7:11am

Post 45 of 57

Fudge Dog

Force: 1955 | Joined: 17th May 2009 | Posts: 80

VisionLab User FXpreset Maker FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

That's a pretty specific rating there, Fudge Dog- but thanks!
Yeah 100 would be my fav film ever smile
Posted: Sun, 21st Nov 2010, 1:16am

Post 46 of 57

Sparky Films

Force: 400 | Joined: 28th Oct 2010 | Posts: 2

EffectsLab Pro User

Gold Member

Ha ha! I LIKE THAT...AWESOME WORK HOMIES
Posted: Mon, 22nd Nov 2010, 5:05am

Post 47 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Thanks man! We're about to release our new parody, 'The Brocial Network' too! Check out the site at www.500MillionBros.com!
Posted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010, 10:17pm

Post 48 of 57

AwesomeFist

Force: 288 | Joined: 6th Dec 2008 | Posts: 541

Windows User MacOS User

Member

I would see this if it came out in theaters.
Posted: Wed, 29th Dec 2010, 5:16pm

Post 49 of 57

Graham Roman

Force: 965 | Joined: 24th Dec 2007 | Posts: 18

VisionLab User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker

Gold Member

I like it!
Posted: Sun, 20th Feb 2011, 6:08am

Post 50 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

I just wanted to let everyone know, in case anyone has missed it, that Inebriation is up for numerous FXHome Awards this year- so if you support us please do go and vote for this in 'Best Cinematography', 'Best VFX', and 'Best Movie'!

And if you support Inebriation in 'Best Editing', please vote for our film Release instead to help us garner the most votes under one submission and help us win!

Finally- if you support Ben or I for 'Best Filmmaker' in all of our previous, current, and future endeavors, vote for me, Atom to pool the votes between Ben and myself.

Thanks for all the support in getting us to the nominees in the awards this year!
Posted: Thu, 10th Mar 2011, 3:17am

Post 51 of 57

JustinHayward

Force: 400 | Joined: 31st Jul 2010 | Posts: 3

EffectsLab Pro User

Gold Member

LOL! Keep up the good work!!!
Posted: Thu, 14th Apr 2011, 6:52am

Post 52 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Haha, thought I'd make mention that now we've got a new copycat out there, ripping everything down to the exact lines and titles from our video. Check it out here.

It's rather hilariously terrible and shamelessly mimicking. But I suppose we love it for that. biggrin

In other (rather large) news, we're only 1,000 views away from a million now. Pretty cool stuff.
Posted: Fri, 15th Apr 2011, 6:06am

Post 53 of 57

rogolo

Force: 5436 | Joined: 29th May 2005 | Posts: 1513

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 4 User MacOS User

Gold Member

Atom wrote:

Haha, thought I'd make mention that now we've got a new copycat out there, ripping everything down to the exact lines and titles from our video. Check it out here.
Oh noes---he's gone!! That was one of the more hilariously-bad videos on YouTube while it lasted.

In other news, your next refresh of views should tip the almighty 1M mark:
Posted: Fri, 15th Apr 2011, 5:53pm

Post 54 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

One million.
Posted: Mon, 18th Apr 2011, 8:06am

Post 55 of 57

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Congrats! Did you party?
Posted: Mon, 18th Apr 2011, 3:18pm

Post 56 of 57

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Hehe- not nearly as much as we wanted. wink

The Friday was between a black-tie event on Thursday and a live music/camping event/festival Saturday, so it became more of a 'break' day than anything else. We tend to party too hard every now and then in Texas.

Plus, practically all of our friends and female acquaintances were in the Total Frat Move video, which we're still waiting to celebrate the release of, so they all are still on pins-and-needles about that. (which should be premiering any day now)
Posted: Wed, 27th Apr 2011, 5:02pm

Post 57 of 57

Staff Only

Force: 1805 | Joined: 22nd Feb 2005 | Posts: 1232

VisionLab User MacOS User

Gold Member

Atom wrote:

One million.
Congrats! Also you haven't made it big, until you have been dubbed. wink