You are viewing an archive of the old fxhome.com forums. The community has since moved to hitfilm.com.

Bane and Selina Kyle in Dark Knight Rises

Posted: Wed, 19th Jan 2011, 5:44pm

Post 1 of 118

Joecool1081

Force: 460 | Joined: 7th Oct 2006 | Posts: 221

EffectsLab Pro User

Gold Member

Warner Bros. Pictures announced today that Anne Hathaway has been cast as Selina Kyle in Christopher Nolan’s “The Dark Knight Rises.” She will be starring alongside Christian Bale, who returns in the title role of Bruce Wayne/Batman. Christopher Nolan stated, “I am thrilled to have the opportunity to work with Anne Hathaway, who will be a fantastic addition to our ensemble as we complete our story.”

In addition, Tom Hardy has been set to play Bane. Nolan said, “I am delighted to be working with Tom again and excited to watch him bring to life our new interpretation of one of Batman’s most formidable enemies.” Nolan will direct the film from a screenplay he wrote with Jonathan Nolan, from a story by Christopher Nolan and David S. Goyer. Nolan will also produce the film with his longtime producing partner, Emma Thomas, and Charles Roven. “The Dark Knight Rises” is slated for release on July 20, 2012. The film will be distributed worldwide by Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company.

(SOURCE ARTICLE: http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=73379)

What do you guys think about this?
Posted: Wed, 19th Jan 2011, 5:48pm

Post 2 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Rating: +2

OH HELL YES.

I would try to hide my excitement, but my pants don't go that tight. That's the best news I've heard all year. Not only am I so glad they didn't go with the Riddler, but Tom Hardy as Bane is going to be awesome. Something tells me they will do that character great respect, and not turn him into a lumbering, mindless behemoth again. And Anne Hathaway isn't bad either. Here's hoping she spends half the film in tight leather. wink

Please let me go to sleep right now, and wake up late next July.... Oh please, oh please, oh please!
Posted: Wed, 19th Jan 2011, 6:13pm

Post 3 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

I'm not really that into Anne Hathaway the way Aculag is, but as an actress, she's pretty good (IMO), and I'm excited to see what Christopher Nolan and her come up with for a Catwoman, I expect it to be intense.

I don't know much about Tom Hardy but the name does ring a bell, and because they went with Bane, over some of their other options, and I expect Christopher Nolan to really play into the mind of Bane as that aspect of him has never really been explored before. I really hope they go with a better creation story than some random prisoner gets injected with some random fluid... I really hope Nolan does for Bane what he did for Joker...

Anyway, I have faith in Nolan to do these two very unique characters justice.
Posted: Wed, 19th Jan 2011, 6:17pm

Post 4 of 118

Axeman

Force: 17995 | Joined: 20th Jan 2002 | Posts: 6124

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker MacOS User

SuperUser

Those are both very exiting casting moves. I have a hard time imagining either of them NOT working really well. And as the writers and director have demonstrated that they have a pretty good idea what they are doing when it comes to making movies, this should be very cool.

But here's hoping that Bale doesn't try to take the voice even farther over the top the third time round.
Posted: Wed, 19th Jan 2011, 8:17pm

Post 5 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Aculag wrote:

Here's hoping she spends half the film in tight leather. wink
+1 for you Aculag. And may I just say....


@%#$ YEAH!

I have always felt that Bane was such an under appreciated villain, especially after that crap in Batman & Robin. People don't realize that Bane is actually extremely smart and not just a giant wall of muscle. Anyone who has read Knightfall knows he's a very good strategist, and if there is anyone who can bring out what the majority of people aren't aware of it's Nolan.

Catwoman I'm not AS enthused for, but I love, and I do mean LOVE me some Anne Hathaway. Catwoman seems a tad overdone to me at this point what with the atrocity that was Halle Berry. Not that I'm a fan of Michelle Pfeiffer, but with Catwoman having been done twice already it feels like overkill.

It does however make sense to have Catwoman come in though, after Rachel's death. Catwoman has always been Batman's main attraction, anyone who has read Hush will agree. He might not always trust her, but he still lusts for her.

All in all I can not wait. Like even a little bit. I can easily say I have never wanted a time machine more than I do at this very moment.
Posted: Wed, 19th Jan 2011, 8:22pm

Post 6 of 118

Terminal Velocity

Force: 2507 | Joined: 7th Apr 2008 | Posts: 1350

VisionLab User FXpreset Maker Windows User

Gold Member

BANE! YES!
I was betting and praying that Bane would be in this movie. He is such a beast and a well-rounded type of villain. One of my friends thinks he would be a bad choice because he's a "big dumb fistfight villain". Of course, everyone who knows Batman knows that's not true. Lord, now I can't wait for this movie to come out.
Posted: Wed, 19th Jan 2011, 8:24pm

Post 7 of 118

Pooky

Force: 4834 | Joined: 8th Jul 2003 | Posts: 5913

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User MacOS User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Both villains who've never been done properly in a movie before, so I'm pumped!
Posted: Wed, 19th Jan 2011, 11:47pm

Post 8 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Terminal Velocity wrote:

Lord, now I can't wait for this movie to come out.
Now? Only just now? I've been waiting since I walked out of TDK. I wonder if Catwoman and Bane will work together or against each other?
Posted: Thu, 20th Jan 2011, 5:29am

Post 9 of 118

Serpent

Force: 5426 | Joined: 26th Dec 2003 | Posts: 6515

CompositeLab Pro User EffectsLab Pro User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Selina Kyle is awesome, glad they're doing that, and Hathaway should be great. I've never been a fan of Bane, so I'm admittedly a bit disappointed there, but I bet Nolan will make it awesome. Though I was always scared of the villain as a kid, so it's pretty cool nonetheless. Can't wait for the final installment.
Posted: Thu, 20th Jan 2011, 10:22am

Post 10 of 118

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

I don't know anything about Bane outside of Batman & Robin (ick) and the Arkham Asylum game. Tom Hardy doesn't seem like an obvious physical match - but he does terrify me as an actor, so could work rather well.
Posted: Thu, 20th Jan 2011, 8:17pm

Post 11 of 118

Thrawn

Force: 1995 | Joined: 11th Aug 2006 | Posts: 1962

CompositeLab Pro User EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Tarn wrote:

Tom Hardy doesn't seem like an obvious physical match - but he does terrify me as an actor, so could work rather well.
Never doubt Tom Hardy when it comes to physically meeting the requirements of a character.

I'm happy to see Tom Hardy will play the highly underrated character of Bane, but not a fan of Anne Hathaway. Her acting ability has always been "meh" and her attractive qualities have been overshadowed by her extremely oversized mouth. But maybe I'm just being nit picky.. wink

I'm trusting that Chris Nolan knows what he's doing.
Posted: Thu, 20th Jan 2011, 9:42pm

Post 12 of 118

swintonmaximilian

Force: 1970 | Joined: 23rd Jun 2007 | Posts: 527

VisionLab User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Really happy with Tom Hardy, Bane is an interesting character to take on. Not so keen on Hathaway, although I'm interested to see where they will take it. I have to say that Michelle Pfieffer as Selina Kyle/catwoman is one of my all time favourite performances in a film, and my favourite thing out of any batman film. So, maybe that's why I'm not desperate to see catwoman as done by Nolan, although I'm sure it will be excellent.
Posted: Fri, 21st Jan 2011, 8:02am

Post 13 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Yeah like I said before I am disappointed to see Catwoman in it at all really, but when thought about logically it kind of does make perfect sense. I was really hoping Nolan would bring in a villain that has never graced the silver screen, but hopefully he will really dive into Bane's backstory and redeem his character.
Posted: Tue, 25th Jan 2011, 4:47am

Post 14 of 118

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Rating: +1

I got bored editing and working on some paid stuff, so I took 2 hours and made this. Fan-made, of course, but I like how it turned out...



It's a Bane-centric teaser poster, obviously. But yeah- the result of nervousness with other projects (Brocial Network premiere, ahoy!) and boredom.
Posted: Tue, 25th Jan 2011, 5:13am

Post 15 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

Atom, that is AWESOME!!! I wish that was the actual poster....
Posted: Tue, 25th Jan 2011, 5:20am

Post 16 of 118

Pooky

Force: 4834 | Joined: 8th Jul 2003 | Posts: 5913

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User MacOS User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Hmm, that's an interesting take, but considering the Nolanverse Batmans' history of AMAZING posters, I'm looking forward to being blown away by the official one.
Posted: Tue, 25th Jan 2011, 5:54am

Post 17 of 118

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

I dunno Pooky, I thought most of The Dark Knight posters were cool, but the Batman Begins ones were nothing the write home about. And the TDK ones varied greatly.

For my money the Inception campaign took everything good about TDK's posters, and kept better consistency.

Stuff like this:



But really, The Dark Knight did have some amazing stuff promo/print-materials-wise. This is more what I was trying to keep in consistency with:





They're pretty damn close in style, right? I'm actually fairly impressed with myself. biggrin

But really I was trying to copy some of the avant-garde-y-ish styled Dark Knight posters and do one with a pre-venom/steroids Bane (Tom Hardy in the polaroid all tattooed up with the name 'Dorrance' written under it, Bane's real name)- with throwbacks to people who know the character's history. (a map of South America, a luchadore mask sketch, etc.)
Posted: Tue, 25th Jan 2011, 6:40am

Post 18 of 118

Pooky

Force: 4834 | Joined: 8th Jul 2003 | Posts: 5913

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User MacOS User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Yeah, the Inception posters were great, but I thought these were brilliant:




Most likely TDKR will have a third colour scheme, too. My bet's on red.
Posted: Tue, 25th Jan 2011, 7:11am

Post 19 of 118

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

I can almost guarantee you it'll be green. It's the natural shift from Inception and TDK- which were a transition of blue to blue-green.

Of course that's guessing and based on really nothing, and nerdy as hell, but whatever. smile

(And I hated that Joker-back-to-the-camera-road poster. Sooooo photoshopp-y looking to me. Sorta silly, like this:



I did, however, like the final set they ended on for the premiere and DVD/Bluray...

Posted: Tue, 25th Jan 2011, 6:38pm

Post 20 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Cool posters Atom smile I could see the scheme for these ones being green,venom is green and Bane is full of that sh!t. My other guess is that each character's poster will have a different color scheme. Green for Bane, and purple for CW? A throwback to a few of her old costumes.
Posted: Tue, 25th Jan 2011, 9:09pm

Post 21 of 118

Terminal Velocity

Force: 2507 | Joined: 7th Apr 2008 | Posts: 1350

VisionLab User FXpreset Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Yeah, what The FE said. Bane's power in the comics/cartoon comes from the venom or acid he is pumped full of. Besides this, his personality just seems to fit green better. If anyone is red, it's Killer Croc.
Posted: Tue, 25th Jan 2011, 10:11pm

Post 22 of 118

Pooky

Force: 4834 | Joined: 8th Jul 2003 | Posts: 5913

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User MacOS User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Isn't Venom only green in the movie? I'm pretty sure his tubes are red in some incarnations - plus, his eyes are red in the comics.

On the other hand, the Joker and Two Face weren't blue, so maybe this isn't actually relevant.
Posted: Wed, 26th Jan 2011, 3:26pm

Post 23 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

A valid point, in Arkham Asylum the Venom is red. There have been versions of the villian with both colors, but for the most part actually the tubes stay colorless in the comics. I guess we are just going to have to wait and find out what color it will be, I'm fine with red or green, just as long as it isn't some ridiculous color like gold or something. I could actually see Nolan making it black, almost tar-like or something to that effect.
Posted: Wed, 26th Jan 2011, 4:09pm

Post 24 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

I have to wonder if he (Nolan) will do what he did for Joker, for Bane. A staple of the character of Joker is the bleached skin , which he didn't have in the movie, (he has the make-up instead). I hope he will do the same thing with Bane, maybe make it slightly more realistic/based in real life. Maybe make the "venom" more steroid like.
Posted: Wed, 26th Jan 2011, 9:50pm

Post 25 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

The only problem with trying to play down the venom is that Bane has a very unique esthetic look, and the only reasonable way to make it like steroids would be to not have the tube into his head. I really don't think Nolan would take that away. The venom is steroids though really, it only differs because he has to take it every 12 hours or so. So really he might as well just leave it the way it is, IMO.
Posted: Mon, 14th Feb 2011, 5:09pm

Post 26 of 118

jawajohnny

Force: 1965 | Joined: 14th Dec 2007 | Posts: 829

VisionLab User VideoWrap User MuzzlePlug User Windows User

Gold Member

So it looks like Joseph Gordon-Levitt will be in the film after all:

http://www.deadline.com/2011/02/joseph-gordon-levitt-in-talks-to-join-the-dark-knight-rises/

I just hope he's not playing Robin. razz

EDIT: Marion Cotillard is now in talks to play the love interest. That's now three actors from Inception. Can this cast get any more epic?

EDIT 2: Okay... make that four actors from Inception... if you count Michael Caine.

http://www.slashfilm.com/french-newspaper-reports-marion-cotillard-cast-the-dark-knight-rises/

Last edited Wed, 16th Feb 2011, 11:47pm; edited 1 times in total.

Posted: Mon, 14th Feb 2011, 7:39pm

Post 27 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

jawajohnny wrote:

Can this cast get any more epic?
Yes, call in DiCaprio!
Posted: Wed, 16th Feb 2011, 8:57pm

Post 28 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

I don't know, DiCaprio in Batman? I think that's where I have to draw the line smile
Posted: Wed, 16th Feb 2011, 9:46pm

Post 29 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

They should just remake Inception. But with Batman.
Posted: Wed, 16th Feb 2011, 9:49pm

Post 30 of 118

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Rating: +1

B A T C E P T I O N
Posted: Wed, 16th Feb 2011, 11:06pm

Post 31 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

I smell a new Atomic production coming on...
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 1:13am

Post 32 of 118

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

It is crazy that all these people will be in it. As long as it doesn't 'feel weird' while watching the movie I'm fine if the whole cast of Inception comes in! BRING IN LEO and Ellen Paige!

Nolan does montages right? I'd like this movie to start with a cool montage showing what Bruce has been up to now that Gotham no longer needs Batman, and how Gotham has been doing.

So what do you want them to improve on in this movie?

I want them to improve on the action. Everything else was great, but the action in the first two (though it was a lot better in TDK) was nothing special. I know in Nolan's 'realistic' world cool stuff don't happen often, but he really has to find a way to make it work in this one. It's the last one. Batman is supposed to be this huge badass who can take on 600 men; I'm just not seeing it in his movies.

I also want them to give Bruce Wayne a personality. In TDK there were no Bruce, only Batman dressed as a bat, and Batman dressed in regular clothes. I'm hoping this movie will show us more Bruce Wayne since it was implied at the end of TDK that his Batman days were over.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 1:27am

Post 33 of 118

Thrawn

Force: 1995 | Joined: 11th Aug 2006 | Posts: 1962

CompositeLab Pro User EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

RodyPolis wrote:


It's the last one. Batman is supposed to be this huge badass who can take on 600 men; I'm just not seeing it in his movies..
I think it's safe to say that this would effectively ruin everything this Batman era has worked towards. The thing that makes Batman so great is that he's human, and is fallible. Him "taking on 600 men" would completely ruin that image. A few criminals at a time, maybe, but let's not get unrealistic. I'd say that they did fine with the action in the Dark Knight. Besides, it's never been about physical fighting with the Joker.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 2:15pm

Post 34 of 118

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

I don't mean I want him to take on 600 men literally (I was referring to that quote in Batman Begins) , I'm saying I just don't see his fighting abilities shown that much. Like that scene in TDK (the party for Harvey) where Batman fights Joker and his guys was kinda embarrassing to watch. I was thinking "Wow, that guy had 10 years of training?"

Since the villain is Bane I think we'll see Batman make use of his fighting skills.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 2:46pm

Post 35 of 118

danielgwood

Force: 5650 | Joined: 7th Jun 2010 | Posts: 224

VisionLab User PhotoKey 5 Pro User Windows User MacOS User

FXhome Team Member

Hmm, well he did have more trouble beating Joker physically then I expected. But as Thrawn says, Joker isn't about the physical. And he cheated (using dogs, human shields etc).

Bane should mean a more physical villain, as long as they don't make him a dumb brute that's fine by me.

I'm hoping they avoid any more bordering-on-silly tech, i.e. the sonar specs thing in TDK. Stick to gritty please, let's not make this a Die Another Day.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 3:07pm

Post 36 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

I personally want Batman to start killing Villains (though it would never happen), it would save soooooooooooo many lives..
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 3:38pm

Post 37 of 118

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Ya those heroes' no kill policy isn't the best. I'm sure that worked well for comic books since they would always be able to bring the villain back to sell more comics, but for a movie I think he should just kill them.

In Batman Begins he told Rhas he wouldn't kill him, but he didn't have to save him. Yet in TDK the Joker is falling down the building and he goes out of his way to save him. Why? Cause the guilt of killing the Joker would be too much? Please...
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 4:05pm

Post 38 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

Haha good point. I wish he would quit saving criminals and "let them die" if they are headed that way... Ya know?
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 4:08pm

Post 39 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

@danielgwood - I agree about ridiculous bond-esque gadgets, but it would be nice to see some actual Batman gear, there has been serious lack of batarangs and the grappling hook.

@Biblmac and RodyPolis - No. Batman doesn't kill people. You cant change the source material for a movie just because you think it would be cooler. Every single movie that deters from the original source material is complete sh!t. A little here and there sure, but to change the main characters beliefs and policies is WAY out of line.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 4:29pm

Post 40 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

@The FE, you don't know much about Batman do you? In 1939 when he was created he carried a gun, and shot criminals. His original character was directed toward adults. When the creators realized that adults weren't reading the comics and that kids were frightened by them they changed it to a dart gun that tranquilized his foes. So, let's be true to the real source material and put a gun in his hand and have him shoot the crap out of them bad guys!
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 4:34pm

Post 41 of 118

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

I think it's less about guilt and more about setting a standard and inspiring through example. Wayne became Batman because he wanted to inspire others to be proud of their city and not let it be ruined by corruption and crime.

Killing criminals doesn't do that - it might clean up the streets temporarily, but it does so through violent, criminal activity. He needs to show that he's better than the criminals. It's kinda like how invading countries with an army and blowing stuff up isn't the most effective tactic for inspiring democratic ideals in populations, even if it gets rid of the nasty dictator. wink
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 4:41pm

Post 42 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

Tarn wrote:

It's kinda like how invading countries with an army and blowing stuff up isn't the most effective tactic for inspiring democratic ideals in populations, even if it gets rid of the nasty dictator. wink
Haha says you!
Bush would say differently
But anywho, you do have a point. But the way I see it, after TDK, he completely ruined that idea when he let Batman be blamed for Harvey's death. He already inspired someone, Harvey, and now he is a murderer, so why not just kill the rest of them bad guys while he is at it and have someone like Harvey be inspired to get rid of Batman? You see, Harvey inspires someone else, pretty straightforward, that same person is also inspired by Batman, via reverse-psychology, because he realizes Batman must be stopped. Then you have your inspiration, you have clean streets, and you have a new good face.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 7:54pm

Post 43 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Rating: -5

Biblmac wrote:

@The FE, you don't know much about Batman do you?
I can guarantee that I know WAY more about Batman than you. Im a f*cking encyclopedia. I am perfectly aware that that he USED to carry a gun. He also used to throw people off roofs and strangle his enemies. He even had a machine gun on the first Batplane for gods' sake. I know these things. HOWEVER that version of Batman died a long time ago, (Detective Comics #39 published in 1940 is you want to be specific about it wink ) all of these things happened in the first year of publication. The CURRENT version of Batman, the one that Bale portrays isn't the gun toting, roof-throwing strangling man from 1939. If that was the case Batman would have been butchering people for the past two movies. If that was the case, then when Bruce Wayne disarmed one of Joker's thugs at his party for Dent and took his gun in TDK, he would have just walked into the main room and blew Joker's face in. Did he? No. Nolan's movies aren't 1939 Batman, they're current Batman. The Batman that took a vow against killing.

So how's about you shut your mouth, kay cupcake?
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 8:53pm

Post 44 of 118

Terminal Velocity

Force: 2507 | Joined: 7th Apr 2008 | Posts: 1350

VisionLab User FXpreset Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Rating: +1/-1

Hey, The FE. Lose the attitude. You are nothing special, you are nothing great, you are nothing amazing. No one respects that attitude.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 9:02pm

Post 45 of 118

Pooky

Force: 4834 | Joined: 8th Jul 2003 | Posts: 5913

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User MacOS User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Rating: +1

Well there's a good demonstration of how being overly violent is counter-productive!
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 9:03pm

Post 46 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

@The FE, Haha, I get it, you know who Batman is, was, and is to come apparently. My apologies. For the record, the Bale Batman *never* took a vow against killing. He just simply hasn't been pushed hard enough yet.

You see when you mentioned the source material, I instantly thought of the original batman. The *true* source. Where he actually came from. Especially since he is now considered a murderer after TDK, I don't see why his character can't just keep getting darker. Keep getting pushed. Bruce, like all humans, is fallible and is controlled for the most part by his feelings. I hope that he just gets so pissed off in this one that he kills someone. That would be worth seeing. It won't happen, but it'll show a dark side of Batman never before seen in any Batman movie. Does anyone remember Tim Burton's Batman movie? That has got to be the least creepy Tim Burton film I have ever seen, I'm kinda disappointed...

A perfect, never kill, Batman is good for child comics, but why not get back to the roots, the Batman that was originally intended for an Adult audience? Mind you, it won't happen, but it would be awesome if it did!

PS I didn't neg your post, FE
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 9:39pm

Post 47 of 118

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Biblmac wrote:

Mind you, it won't happen, but it would be awesome if it did!
Would it? There's no fun, redemption, humanity, or depth to a vigilante that is absolutely no different than the criminals who murder, breach, and fight the world he's fighting to protect.

Are you even protecting anyone if you're just going around murdering people like a serial killer, anyway? Not really, no.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 9:47pm

Post 48 of 118

Terminal Velocity

Force: 2507 | Joined: 7th Apr 2008 | Posts: 1350

VisionLab User FXpreset Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Sorry about exploding at you, FE.
If Batman ran around killing people, he would just be a jerk, not a hero. The reason he's so well-trained in hand-to-hand combat is so he can incapacitate without killing. Although I do think that his uncanny ability to not kill anyone in TDK was a little goofy. (Although there's no guarantee that some of them didn't die later from hemorrhaging or organ damage). What qualifies as "killing" someone anyway? What about punching them in the face so that they die later from severe concussion? I think his code should be "don't kill anyone on purpose if you have a reasonable option", cause that's a little easier to do without hampering your main objective.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 10:01pm

Post 49 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Terminal Velocity wrote:

Sorry about exploding at you, FE.
Accepted. What annoyed me the most was the assumption that I know nothing about Batman, when instead I am a massive fanboy that just hasn't expressed my obsession in this community.

In any case, Batman shoudn't kill. It goes against everything that he fights for. If he starts killing people then he is no better than the mugger that gunned down his parents in Crime Alley all those years ago.

Terminal Velocity wrote:

What qualifies as "killing" someone anyway? What about punching them in the face so that they die later from severe concussion?
The point of all his years of training was to gain self restraint and control, so that he didn't accidentally pound someone to death, either on the spot or from any injuries later on.

If Bale does end up killing someone in this one I will be severely disappointed and probably won't enjoy it as much.
Posted: Thu, 17th Feb 2011, 10:16pm

Post 50 of 118

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

He did technically kill Harvey-- He pushed him to his death. Also, when he's in the Batmobile and he has a head on collision with that truck who was after Dent, whoever was in that driver's seat has been squashed to death. It's the scene where the Batmobile sends the truck hitting the above bridge (or whatever it was).
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 12:36am

Post 51 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Batman should kill HIMSELF. That would be the ultimate twist.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 2:41am

Post 52 of 118

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Aculag wrote:

Batman should kill HIMSELF. That would be the ultimate twist.
Maybe he's been dead all along; now THAT's a twist!
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 3:04am

Post 53 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

He wouldn't be like the mugger at all. He would be killing killlers so they can't kill anyone else. That is called saving lives. Think about it, you kill the joker and the 100s of people he later kills, never die. 1 dies instead of 100. Simple as that. Kill the serial killer so he can't kill more people, that's what our justice system does. Hence the death penalty, which the joker magically never gets. Which is surprising that he always ends up in an asylum when some of the most famous serial killers were just as insane as the joker if not more, and they got the death penalty and went to regular prisons rather than asylums.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 3:10am

Post 54 of 118

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Biblmac wrote:

He would be killing killlers so they can't kill anyone else. That is called saving lives.
This is what sociopaths think, too.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 4:05am

Post 55 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

Haha true Atom, true. That doesn't mean they're wrong... wink

EDIT: Just thought of something, Atom, we (meaning the US, since we are both from the US, I figure saying we is ok, right? and I digress,) are in Afghanistan and Pakistan, why? So that we can find, and kill terrorists before they can hurt anyone else, right? Same thing as I'm suggesting. Kill the serial killers before they kill me! Besides what fun is a perfect hero anyway?

Last edited Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 4:33am; edited 1 times in total.

Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 4:17am

Post 56 of 118

Pooky

Force: 4834 | Joined: 8th Jul 2003 | Posts: 5913

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User MacOS User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Ellen Page -> Death Penalty

Now there's an interesting thread evolution.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 5:16am

Post 57 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Biblmac wrote:

So that we can find, and kill terrorists before they can hurt anyone else, right? Same thing as I'm suggesting. Kill the serial killers before they kill me!
While we're at it, let's just kill everyone, because you can never really know who's gonna turn out to be a serial killer.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 5:35am

Post 58 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

Aculag wrote:

While we're at it, let's just kill everyone, because you can never really know who's gonna turn out to be a serial killer.
Well that's no fun...

But in all seriousness, there is a difference between killing someone who has already murdered someone and intends on killing you, and killing someone who has done nothing wrong. For instance, Joker's ultimate aim was to kill Batman, or so it seemed, so technically if Batman killed him, it would have been self defense, not even illegal (depending on the state and whether they have a "Duty to Retreat" law), but for the most part, killing someone who you believe whole heartedly is going to kill you is legal (Of course this only goes for us in the U.S.A.). You just have to prove to the court that you "knew" he was trying to kill you, it helps if they have a weapon in their hand and you don't. wink
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 5:46am

Post 59 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Biblmac wrote:

You just have to prove to the court that you "knew" he was trying to kill you,
What so Batman is just supposed to show up in court on a weekday morning? Just out of curiosity who would be his lawyer?
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 5:50am

Post 60 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

The FE wrote:

What so Batman is just supposed to show up in court on a weekday morning? Just out of curiosity who would be his lawyer?
Harvey Dent wink

On a serious note, half of what he does, and the way he obtains evidence is illegal, and he never shows up to court, so he is already breaking the law, why else is the Gotham Police trying to find him? They're supposed to arrest him remember? Besides in this country you are innocent till proven guilty, so if you never show up in court, you never get convicted. So you're not guilty right? wink
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 6:02am

Post 61 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Biblmac wrote:

On a serious note, half of what he does, and the way he obtains evidence is illegal
When youre the greatest detective in the world I'm not sure anyone cares wink
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 6:05am

Post 62 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

Haha so he can kidnap a CEO from Japan but he can't kill a serial killer? Sad world we live in isn't it?

Due to Aculag's observation I'll edit my post:

Haha so he can kidnap a CEO from Japan but he can't kill a serial killer? Sad world he lives in isn't it? wink

Last edited Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 6:07am; edited 2 times in total.

Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 6:06am

Post 63 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Oh, sorry, I forgot we weren't talking about real life.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 6:56am

Post 64 of 118

Pooky

Force: 4834 | Joined: 8th Jul 2003 | Posts: 5913

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User MacOS User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Aculag wrote:

Oh, sorry, I forgot we weren't talking about real life.
That's what a serial killer would say!
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 7:20am

Post 65 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Pooky wrote:

Aculag wrote:

Oh, sorry, I forgot we weren't talking about real life.
That's what a serial killer would say!
Oh yeah? Well, would a serial killer say THIS?
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 12:33pm

Post 66 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Aculag wrote:

Pooky wrote:

Aculag wrote:

Oh, sorry, I forgot we weren't talking about real life.
That's what a serial killer would say!
Oh yeah? Well, would a serial killer say THIS?
Sounds like serial killer talk to me!
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 3:12pm

Post 67 of 118

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Rating: +1

Biblmac wrote:

t of something, Atom, we (meaning the US, since we are both from the US, I figure saying we is ok, right? and I digress,) are in Afghanistan and Pakistan, why? So that we can find, and kill terrorists before they can hurt anyone else, right? Same thing as I'm suggesting. Kill the serial killers before they kill me! Besides what fun is a perfect hero anyway?
Yeah, except the actions of the US and UK in Afghanistan have also created a whole load of new terrorists that wouldn't have existed otherwise. While in the short term it got rid of some dictatorial regimes and killed some terrorists, in the long term it's made the world an angrier place.

Which isn't to comment on whether it was right or wrong - but you have to recognise that things aren't as simply as "kill the bad guy, problem solved."

But in all seriousness, there is a difference between killing someone who has already murdered someone and intends on killing you, and killing someone who has done nothing wrong.
By your logic, Saddam Hussein would have been morally correct to bomb the crap out of the USA and kill George Bush.

And therein lies the problem: you're working on the misguided assumption that you (and your country) are always right. That you always know who the good guys and bad guys are. That you have the moral highground.

As soon as anybody makes that kind of assumption, you're going down a very dangerous path. Batman not killing people has nothing to do with the character being 'child friendly' - it's to do with Bruce Wayne making a conscious decision to be better than those he fights. He understands that the world is more complex than "kill the bad guy -> happy ending".
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 3:50pm

Post 68 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

Firstly (EDIT: is that a word? I don't think so, but I don't care biggrin ), I want to say, that this is just my opinion and whether you agree or not, I hope this makes my position perfectly clear. If something is unclear about my "logic" on murder/killing/self defense after this, I'll answer any questions, but I don't plan on debating this further, because honestly, I doubt either of us will change our minds smile

Let's get started shall we?

I'm not saying it is right by any means what is going on in Afghanistan and Pakistan. I was using that as an example of a current event that is relevant to my point, moving on now.

Tan wrote:

And therein lies the problem: you're working on the misguided assumption that you (and your country) are always right.
First, I'm not saying I'm right and I'm not saying that my country is right. For that matter, murdering someone isn't right. Let's make a quick differentiation between murder and killing.

Wikipedia wrote:

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with "malice aforethought"
Assuming I've never killed anyone, (which I haven't wink ) and someone who has previously murdered someone, attempts to kill or murder me for any reason, I see no moral issue with taking that persons life in self defense. Not saying it is right to you, or anyone else, but to me, there is no problem with that.

In reply to this:

Tarn wrote:

By your logic, Saddam Hussein would have been morally correct to bomb the crap out of the USA and kill George Bush.
Now let's say a serial killer/murderer killed your family, but didn't attack you, killing him would then be murder and wrong, because you aren't defending yourself, but rather just attempting to get revenge, when revenge should be up to the justice system regardless of how flawed it is.

On the same note, if I saw someone being attacked by anyone, and it appeared to me that their life was in danger, (and I was as skilled as Batman). I don't see what reason there would be to risk my life to detain him. By all means, if I think I can detain him with minimal bodily harm, I'd do that, but if I may die as a result, forget trying to detain him, I want to survive!

Now to put this in the context of Batman. Now in TDK, the Joker had killed numerous people already so wouldn't it be safe to assume he would kill more? And obviously the police can't keep him locked up. So why not let him fall off the building to his death? It literally saves possibly hundreds of lives in the future. Not to mention the grief that the loved ones have to deal with.

Batman, like earlier mentioned didn't save Ra's Al Ghul, doesn't that make him a murderer, (if Ra's is dead)? So why not let Joker fall? I don't remember him taking any vow in between those two scenes. I didn't even see that much of a character change. One that would make me think that he would save the Joker. Besides, when he's saving Gordon's family, he "kills" Harvey, right?

Now this topic isn't about TDK or BB, so let's talk TDKR, what I was simply saying, before, was that I think it would be nice if Batman would continue getting darker, as he did "kill" Harvey, or at least is blamed for it. In the eyes of the Gotham public, he is a murderer now right? So why try to win back your rep, at the risk of exposing the truth about Harvey (when that is why you took the fall in the first place)? I would personally like to see, in TDKR, Batman become a real Dark Knight.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 7:28pm

Post 69 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Rating: +1

Biblmac wrote:

Besides, when he's saving Gordon's family, he "kills" Harvey, right?
He didnt try to kill Harvey, that's just what ended up happening. He didn't tackle Two Face with the intent of ending his life. Harvey had just as much of a chance to survive the fall as Batman did, if not more because he wasn't sporting a gunshot wound. That's just how it happened. Accidentally killing one criminal doesn't warrant him killing any future criminals he faces. That would be like me accidentally hitting someone with my car and then going Grand Theft Auto on every person I see walking down the street.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 7:38pm

Post 70 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

In that suit I'm sure he had a better chance then Harvey. Remember with Rachel? They "magically" lived from that fall off of whatever building it was...
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 8:40pm

Post 71 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

When Joker pushed Rachel out the window Batman had his cape to help slow the fall. If he didn't that taxi would be covered in Batman and Rachel blood.

When Dent and Batman fell off that platform they fell in the same way, Batman didn't have the energy to try and use his cape to slow the fall. He just let go of that pipe or whatever it was he was holding onto and dropped. So if he fell the same distance with nothing to slow the fall, WITH a gunshot wound to the stomach and survived there is no reason why Dent couldn't have survived with injury.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 8:57pm

Post 72 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

I love these Batman documentaries, and I can't wait for the next one.
Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011, 10:52pm

Post 73 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

What's that Aculag? You want to do a Batman haiku? smile
Posted: Tue, 22nd Feb 2011, 5:56am

Post 74 of 118

Joecool1081

Force: 460 | Joined: 7th Oct 2006 | Posts: 221

EffectsLab Pro User

Gold Member

Rating: +1

Earlier today Tom Hardy (Bronson, Inception) appeared on the British talk show "Alan Carr: Chatty Man" and spoke briefly about his upcoming appearance as Bane in The Dark Knight Rises. The video is now available online, thanks to Batman-News.com and is viewable below.

In addition to joking that Bane's look will depart significantly from the way the character appeared in 1997's Batman & Robin, Hardy also revealed that he plans to spent the next three months putting on muscle weight, shooting for a goal of about 200 pounds before he starts production in May.

Source Article:
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=74597
Posted: Tue, 22nd Feb 2011, 4:57pm

Post 75 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Good find JC, plus one for you smile I really like Alan Carr I think him and that other guy on Friday Night Project are hilarious. Glad to hear that Bane wont look the same as he did in 1997, but then I wouldn't expect him too. Getting more and more excited by the day now.
Posted: Mon, 21st Mar 2011, 6:40pm

Post 76 of 118

DX6channel

Force: 496 | Joined: 9th Jul 2009 | Posts: 110

EffectsLab Pro User Windows User

Gold Member

http://arts.nationalpost.com/2011/03/21/joseph-gordon-levitt-cast-in-new-batman-movie/

Looks like Joseph Gordon-Levitt is going to be Alberto Falcone, the son of former mob boss Carmine Falcone.

What do you think?
Posted: Mon, 21st Mar 2011, 8:12pm

Post 77 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

I think they should just get it over with and hire DiCaprio and Ellen Page, just to round out the Batception cast.
Posted: Mon, 21st Mar 2011, 10:54pm

Post 78 of 118

Pooky

Force: 4834 | Joined: 8th Jul 2003 | Posts: 5913

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User MacOS User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Ooh and Hugh Jackman and David Bowie to round out the Prestige one!
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 12:10am

Post 79 of 118

Joecool1081

Force: 460 | Joined: 7th Oct 2006 | Posts: 221

EffectsLab Pro User

Gold Member

DX6channel wrote:

http://arts.nationalpost.com/2011/03/21/joseph-gordon-levitt-cast-in-new-batman-movie/

Looks like Joseph Gordon-Levitt is going to be Alberto Falcone, the son of former mob boss Carmine Falcone.

What do you think?
It has just been stated that The Variety was wrong and he will not be playing Alberto Falcone. He does still have a part in the movie but it will not be Falcone.

Pretty happy that he will not be Falcone
Still hoping for the Riddler

Source article here:
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=75406
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 1:55am

Post 80 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

It's gonna be Robin.
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 3:39am

Post 81 of 118

jawajohnny

Force: 1965 | Joined: 14th Dec 2007 | Posts: 829

VisionLab User VideoWrap User MuzzlePlug User Windows User

Gold Member

One of these news outlets obviously has false information... and I wouldn't put it past Nolan to have leaked it out himself to keep us on our toes.

I'm pretty confident it won't be Robin. Haven't both Christopher Nolan and Christian Bale previously expressed extreme dislike for the Robin character? I believe Nolan said something along the lines of "Robin is still in a cradle" in this movie timeline, and Bale essentially said he would leave the franchise if Robin got involved.

To me, Falcone seems like the right role. Who else could he be, if The Riddler and Robin (supposedly) aren't in the film.
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 5:16am

Post 82 of 118

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Entertainment Weekly saying Variety is reporting wrong?

Something's really fishy about that. And also sorta embarrassing for both parties. Reputable movie reporters, contradicting eachother on one of the biggest movies. Eek.

Having Gordon-Levitt be Falcone's son brought the story to a potential of being full-circle in my opinion. And, especially since there's so many actors playing the dangerously-edgy-too-many-villains-card in this one, I surely hope we get the new actor as a character that reckons to a previous one and not just another villain or extraneous new character that brings the series further away from the consistency it started with.
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 9:03am

Post 83 of 118

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Given they sowed the seeds of Batman copycats in Dark Knight, introducing a Robin character would actually make a lot of sense. Not in the 60s TV show sense of the character, obviously, but in terms of a young person inspired by Batman and the consequences of that.
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 1:31pm

Post 84 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

I dunno Tarn, I have to agree with Jawa on this one, mostly because I dislike Robin on screen in general, but also because he just doesn't fit, AND because Nolan and Bale has expressed views on Robin similar to mine. I hope it's Falcone, the Falcone family has been around for years in the comics. If it is Falcone then this is how I think it'll play out:

The Joker was supposed to kill Batman but didn't. However Batman has fallen from grace and isn't exactly popular. So now Bane shows up from South America and he's all "Hey I'll kill the Batman!" The Falcones in their desperation will be like "Sure Bane go for it!"

At the same time Catwoman has started up with her burglaries and saving women from muggers and what not when Batman picks up on her trail and the two of them start their little love affair.

And hopefully it will all come down to a MASSIVE battle in the streets involving GCPD (the not crooked ones) Batman and Catwoman vs Bane and the Falcones (plus whatever other mobsters they can recruit. Maybe that sharp dressed black guy from TDK.)
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 2:39pm

Post 85 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Atom wrote:

Entertainment Weekly saying Variety is reporting wrong?

Something's really fishy about that. And also sorta embarrassing for both parties. Reputable movie reporters, contradicting eachother on one of the biggest movies. Eek.

Having Gordon-Levitt be Falcone's son brought the story to a potential of being full-circle in my opinion. And, especially since there's so many actors playing the dangerously-edgy-too-many-villains-card in this one, I surely hope we get the new actor as a character that reckons to a previous one and not just another villain or extraneous new character that brings the series further away from the consistency it started with.
I agree with every word of this. I think Nolan is smart enough that he won't let the final film of his trilogy become saturated by baddies. There's plenty of room for a large cast, and it only makes sense to revisit some of the characters from Begins. Dark Knight had a huge cast, but didn't feel over-the-top at all (except for the cell phone thing. wink) To me, it seems that these latest additions to the cast will be ancillary characters, like Nestor Carbonell or Cillian Murphy in TDK. Even if they cast for many villains, they likely won't have much screen-time. More like an honorable mention.

I'm not worried. And I don't really think it'll be Robin, guys.
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 7:54pm

Post 86 of 118

Atom

Force: 4300 | Joined: 9th May 2004 | Posts: 7014

EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Another thing- Selina Kyle may be Catwoman, but that doesn't mean Catwoman is going to be in TDKR. We've had absolutely no confirmation of that through Nolan or Hathaway or anyone else,, just that she'll be Selina Kyle.

The assumption that we'd get Bane- announced through his villain name- and Catwoman- announced as Selina Kyle- still all seems rather preposterous to me.

I think a plethora of villains can work on a larger scale- more than Carbonell or Murphy's roles in TDK, and more like the Ra's Al Ghul/Falcone/Scarecrow trifecta from Batman Begins. But in order to do that, you can't have all of these supervillains, no matter how 'gritty and realistic and believable' they are.

You've gotta have a Falcone in there, a non-fantastical villain, to even out the excess. If Gordon-Levitt is that to Hathway's Kyle and Hardy's Bane, then things could work. If he's Robin or Black Mask or whoever the hell else, and you've got Marion Cotillard in there too, well that's just oversaturation in my eyes, no matter how gritty it's spun.

Nolan touched on 'uh-oh this is redonkulous' material with the bat-cell-phone-vision, he could tip too far and due worse than that with characters in TDKR if he's not careful. It's a very fine line between grand masterpiece (close to what The Dark Knight/Batman Begins have been) and overcrowded shot-in-the-dark-with-traces-of-excellence. (X-Men 3)

I'm excited and nervous to see where this aligns. Hype alone could kill it, even if is fantastic.
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 8:42pm

Post 87 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Atom wrote:

It's a very fine line between grand masterpiece (close to what The Dark Knight/Batman Begins have been) and overcrowded shot-in-the-dark-with-traces-of-excellence. (X-Men 3)

I'm excited and nervous to see where this aligns. Hype alone could kill it, even if is fantastic.
I'm not concerned. TDK was better than the hype, and after the triple-whammy that was The Prestige, TDK, and Inception, I have more than enough faith in Nolan to pull it off. Something tells me he won't let this film slip into the "This is just getting stupid" rut that Spiderman and X-men fell into with their third films. He knows that this needs to be a grand slam without it being too over the top.

It is interesting that even though we know who some of the major players in this will be, we still have absolutely no idea about the plot, or how these already cast characters will be involved. I guess that is where the line between trepidation and excitement gets blurred. Just not knowing how it's going to work out is enough to make some people assume the worst (not you, Atom, just in general), and others assume the absolute best. But I'm all for speculation! smile
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 9:20pm

Post 88 of 118

Staff Only

Force: 1805 | Joined: 22nd Feb 2005 | Posts: 1232

VisionLab User MacOS User

Gold Member

Aculag wrote:

TDK was better than the hype
Mostly because TDK's hype was all centered around the Joker portrayal and that was over 9000. But the film itself is my least favorite Nolan film. I have probably only seen it 3 or 4 times and have no wish to see it again any time soon. Batman Begins however was up to Nolan's usual "Every line has significance at a later time in the plot/every damn frame is a Chekhov's Gun in some sense" standard that makes his films so awesome.

I really hope (though the name indicates otherwise) that Nolan isn't going further in the direction that The Dark Knight took away from Batman Begins. He needs to come a bit back to the Batman Begins feel of the Nolan-batverse. Remember The Narrows? The glacier training scene? The epic Tumbler car chase? "Where are you?!" "Here."? "Nice coat."? "Still haven't given up on me?" "Never."? The Scarecrow drug scenes? Stuff that makes the film special and memorable? etc.

Contrast to a crime film filmed obviously in Chicago. Apart from the stellar Joker I thought TDK is the most boring and ordinary film Nolan has ever made.
Posted: Tue, 22nd Mar 2011, 9:55pm

Post 89 of 118

DigiSm89

Force: 815 | Joined: 2nd Jun 2002 | Posts: 1898

Windows User

Member

Staff Only wrote:

But the film itself is my least favorite Nolan film. I have probably only seen it 3 or 4 times and have no wish to see it again any time soon.
Wait, so does this mean your favorite Nolan films...you've seen like more than 8 times?
Posted: Wed, 23rd Mar 2011, 2:34am

Post 90 of 118

jawajohnny

Force: 1965 | Joined: 14th Dec 2007 | Posts: 829

VisionLab User VideoWrap User MuzzlePlug User Windows User

Gold Member

Atom wrote:

Entertainment Weekly saying Variety is reporting wrong?

Something's really fishy about that. And also sorta embarrassing for both parties. Reputable movie reporters, contradicting eachother on one of the biggest movies. Eek.
There's some speculation that in this case, Nolan/Warner Bros. may have actually planted false information, either to keep the fans on their toes, or to find out who's leaking out the info. My bet's on Variety having it right, simply because I don't see how else he could fit into an already overcrowded story.

Atom wrote:

Another thing- Selina Kyle may be Catwoman, but that doesn't mean Catwoman is going to be in TDKR. We've had absolutely no confirmation of that through Nolan or Hathaway or anyone else,, just that she'll be Selina Kyle.
I dunno... I think it's a safe bet we'll see Catwoman. I mean, what other "wardrobe" could Wally Pfister be talking about? wink

“She’s so good. She did an incredible job. She is a great, great actress… and she looked phenomenal in the wardrobe.”
Posted: Wed, 23rd Mar 2011, 6:06am

Post 91 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Atom wrote:

Another thing- Selina Kyle may be Catwoman, but that doesn't mean Catwoman is going to be in TDKR. We've had absolutely no confirmation of that through Nolan or Hathaway or anyone else,, just that she'll be Selina Kyle.
That's a long shot. The only way Selina Kyle would only be Selina Kyle is if Nolan included the fact that after The Long Halloween story arc, she believes herself to be Carmine Falcone's illegitimate daughter but doesn't have anything to prove it (which I suppose could end up being completely plausible if JGL ends up playing Falcone's son). Other than that little bit of info, Selina Kyle as herself is a completely useless character when she isn't Catwoman.

Atom wrote:

The assumption that we'd get Bane- announced through his villain name- and Catwoman- announced as Selina Kyle- still all seems rather preposterous to me.
Bane doesn't have any other name. He's just Bane. You're reading too much into it wink
Posted: Wed, 23rd Mar 2011, 9:10am

Post 92 of 118

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Hathaway did refer to her character as 'Catwoman' in a recent interview, I believe. Annoyingly I don't have a reference link, but I did read that somewhere. smile
Posted: Wed, 23rd Mar 2011, 3:29pm

Post 93 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Also, this is Anne Hathaway here. She looks phenomenal in just about anything. Though, I bet she does show up as Catwoman. smile
Posted: Wed, 23rd Mar 2011, 4:22pm

Post 94 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

There is about a %0.00001 chance it isn't Catwoman. I have a little crush on Anne Hathaway too so seeing her in the costume is going to be awesome.
Posted: Sat, 9th Apr 2011, 5:23am

Post 95 of 118

Joecool1081

Force: 460 | Joined: 7th Oct 2006 | Posts: 221

EffectsLab Pro User

Gold Member

Josh Pence has just joined the cast of The Dark Knight Rises
as a young Ra's Al Ghul who will appear in flashbacks set three decades in the past.

The dark knight rises will hit theaters July 20 2012


Full article here
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=76188
Posted: Mon, 11th Apr 2011, 1:04am

Post 96 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

That'd be a twist if they brought Ras back. He is immortal after all, it could happen wink
Posted: Mon, 11th Apr 2011, 1:34am

Post 97 of 118

doppelganger

Force: 134 | Joined: 16th May 2006 | Posts: 1157

MacOS User

Member

Joecool1081 wrote:


The dark knight rises will hit theaters July 20 2012
thats my 20th birthday. Nolan knows how to pick them dates.
Posted: Mon, 11th Apr 2011, 2:34am

Post 98 of 118

jawajohnny

Force: 1965 | Joined: 14th Dec 2007 | Posts: 829

VisionLab User VideoWrap User MuzzlePlug User Windows User

Gold Member

The FE wrote:

That'd be a twist if they brought Ras back. He is immortal after all, it could happen wink
Nah... with Nolan's more "realistic" Batman universe, I think his "immortality" is more of a legend. The title of "Rhas Al Ghul" just gets passed from person to person over the years. What I can see, is Talia Al Ghul showing up at some point. Does anyone know if Marion Cotillard is confirmed yet? It seems that some websites are reporting that she is definitely in the film, where some still say she is only rumored. I'd think that if she's in the film, she'd be Talia.
Posted: Mon, 11th Apr 2011, 4:29am

Post 99 of 118

rogolo

Force: 5436 | Joined: 29th May 2005 | Posts: 1513

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 4 User MacOS User

Gold Member

jawajohnny wrote:

The FE wrote:

That'd be a twist if they brought Ras back. He is immortal after all, it could happen wink
Nah... with Nolan's more "realistic" Batman universe, I think his "immortality" is more of a legend. The title of "Rhas Al Ghul" just gets passed from person to person over the years. What I can see, is Talia Al Ghul showing up at some point. Does anyone know if Marion Cotillard is confirmed yet? It seems that some websites are reporting that she is definitely in the film, where some still say she is only rumored. I'd think that if she's in the film, she'd be Talia.
Came across this article the other day. Never bothered to post it, but it sounds like it addresses both of your questions.
Posted: Mon, 11th Apr 2011, 5:09pm

Post 100 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Well let's be honest, at this point we have absolutely no idea what to believe and what not to believe. With what happened with JGL portraying Falcone and rumors of every huge A lister under the sun being attached to the film, this could all just be another big pile of bullsh!t.

Secondly, I'm not sure I would be fond of Marion Collard playing Talia. I guess it's because (and believe me I KNOW i'm going to take some crap for this) I don't think she's the most attractive woman on the planet, and Talia to me has always been a sex symbol when it comes to Batman.

I'm not some weird guy who was dreams about comic book girls, I swear.

EDIT:

jawajohnny wrote:

Nah... with Nolan's more "realistic" Batman universe, I think his "immortality" is more of a legend.
For some reason I didn't even consider this. You sir are most likely correct.
Posted: Thu, 14th Apr 2011, 1:52am

Post 101 of 118

Thrawn

Force: 1995 | Joined: 11th Aug 2006 | Posts: 1962

CompositeLab Pro User EffectsLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

Rating: +1

Leaked photos of the new batman trailer? Looks rather awesome.
Posted: Thu, 14th Apr 2011, 2:02am

Post 102 of 118

Pooky

Force: 4834 | Joined: 8th Jul 2003 | Posts: 5913

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User MacOS User FXhome Movie Maker

Gold Member

Rating: +1

I shall murder you in your sleep.
Posted: Fri, 15th Apr 2011, 7:27pm

Post 103 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

I can't believe I fell for this...
Posted: Tue, 19th Apr 2011, 7:43pm

Post 104 of 118

jawajohnny

Force: 1965 | Joined: 14th Dec 2007 | Posts: 829

VisionLab User VideoWrap User MuzzlePlug User Windows User

Gold Member

Finally... we know who Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Marion Cotillard are playing. Thankfully, it looks like neither will be a villain.

JGL is John Blake, a beat cop working for (Jim) Gordon, and Cotillard will play Miranda Tate, a Wayne Enterprise board member.

From the sounds of it... I'd say Cotillard will be the primary love interest, while Levitt might be in charge of hunting down Batman?

http://www.slashfilm.com/joseph-gordonlevitt-marion-cotillards-dark-knight-rises-roles-revealed/
Posted: Wed, 20th Apr 2011, 8:19am

Post 105 of 118

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Nice! I'm wondering, given that this is the last film, whether Gordon will find out Batman's identity at some point.

One of the best things about Nolan's Batman is Oldman's Gordon. Perfect depiction of the character.
Posted: Mon, 25th Apr 2011, 3:22pm

Post 106 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

I wouldn't be surprised if Marillon Cotillard's character found out who Batman was. He has an awful habit of telling every girl he hooks up with who he really is wink
Posted: Fri, 20th May 2011, 6:56pm

Post 107 of 118

jawajohnny

Force: 1965 | Joined: 14th Dec 2007 | Posts: 829

VisionLab User VideoWrap User MuzzlePlug User Windows User

Gold Member

First look at Tom Hardy as Bane:

http://www.slashfilm.com/first-look-tom-hardy-as-bane-from-the-dark-knight-rises/

Still waiting for a look at Anne Hathaway in costume... smile
Posted: Fri, 20th May 2011, 7:35pm

Post 108 of 118

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Looks cool! I don't get why so many people on /film are so excited, but whatever.
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011, 5:31am

Post 109 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Because it's gonna be awesome dude, where have you been?

It looks like he's wearing a suit, which I like cuz that's how he was depicted in the BAS. No tubes, though it looks like theres a little spot near the back of the mask to hook one in. Very excited.

Also, I second Jawa's comment smile
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011, 3:14pm

Post 110 of 118

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

I'm mostly talking about all the 'I came' or 'I have to wipe all the jizz from my keyboard' comments.
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011, 3:15pm

Post 111 of 118

Aculag

Force: 8365 | Joined: 21st Jun 2002 | Posts: 8581

EffectsLab Lite User VideoWrap User FXhome Movie Maker MacOS User

Gold Member

RodyPolis wrote:

I'm mostly talking about all the 'I came' or 'I have to wipe all the jizz from my keyboard' comments.
Welcome to the internet, where nerds feel the need to describe all of the bodily fluids they've managed to get on their keyboard/monitor/touchscreen/wacom tablet, even though they really didn't.

Also probably because this is a highly anticipated film, and that still is the first we're seeing of it.
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011, 5:24pm

Post 112 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

I don't know about you but I don't normally do any form of "jizzing" on anything when I see a muscly man...
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011, 5:26pm

Post 113 of 118

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Muscular, Biblmac smile
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011, 5:34pm

Post 114 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

Haha I was trying to add -ly to muscle... Chrome didn't say it was spelled wrong... DANG YOU CHROME!!!!
Posted: Tue, 24th May 2011, 8:20am

Post 115 of 118

Simon K Jones

Force: 27955 | Joined: 1st Jan 2002 | Posts: 11683

VisionLab User VideoWrap User PhotoKey 5 Pro User MuzzlePlug User PowerPlug User PhotoKey 3 Plug-in User FXhome Movie Maker FXpreset Maker Windows User

FXhome Team Member

Rating: +1

RodyPolis wrote:

I'm mostly talking about all the 'I came' or 'I have to wipe all the jizz from my keyboard' comments.
Just wait until you see the next few HitFilm videos.
Posted: Tue, 24th May 2011, 4:39pm

Post 116 of 118

RodyPolis

Force: 805 | Joined: 28th Apr 2007 | Posts: 1839

CompositeLab Lite User FXhome Movie Maker Windows User

Gold Member

Tarn wrote:

RodyPolis wrote:

I'm mostly talking about all the 'I came' or 'I have to wipe all the jizz from my keyboard' comments.
Just wait until you see the next few HitFilm videos.
Lol when should I expect it?
Posted: Tue, 24th May 2011, 5:27pm

Post 117 of 118

Biblmac

Force: 852 | Joined: 12th Jun 2007 | Posts: 1513

EffectsLab Lite User Windows User

Gold Member

RodyPolis wrote:

Lol when should I expect it?
Today! They revealed the first look at something in 3D space! biggrin
Posted: Wed, 25th May 2011, 5:39am

Post 118 of 118

The FE

Force: 435 | Joined: 10th Apr 2007 | Posts: 580

EffectsLab Pro User MacOS User

Gold Member

Sweet. I can't wait to see what its all about